<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s only a drink!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://louisandlouisa.com/2006/06/its-only-a-drink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://louisandlouisa.com/2006/06/its-only-a-drink/</link>
	<description>&#34;Travel, in the younger sort, is a part of education; in the elder, a part of experience.&#34; Francis Bacon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prélude à Grand Puy Ducasse, 2000 &#8212; Louis and Louisa</title>
		<link>http://louisandlouisa.com/2006/06/its-only-a-drink/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Prélude à Grand Puy Ducasse, 2000 &#8212; Louis and Louisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisandlouisa.com/?p=154#comment-198</guid>
		<description>[...] But if we want to keep the discussion really short.  Generally, I take reds more seriously than whites.  (I cannot justify that very well!)  And, if I am going to treat myself extra well, I head for Bordeaux.  And, I prefer Bordeaux reds that predominantly use Cabernet Sauvignon.  Finally, the area within Bordeaux that  I usually prefer is Pauillac.  Perhaps this is because it was a Pauillac wine, Chateau Batailley 1966, that got me started on this ...! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But if we want to keep the discussion really short.  Generally, I take reds more seriously than whites.  (I cannot justify that very well!)  And, if I am going to treat myself extra well, I head for Bordeaux.  And, I prefer Bordeaux reds that predominantly use Cabernet Sauvignon.  Finally, the area within Bordeaux that  I usually prefer is Pauillac.  Perhaps this is because it was a Pauillac wine, Chateau Batailley 1966, that got me started on this &#8230;! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moyey</title>
		<link>http://louisandlouisa.com/2006/06/its-only-a-drink/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Moyey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisandlouisa.com/?p=154#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Very interesting comment. I have only had a first growth twice in my life. One was a 1987 Lafite; and the other was a 1984 Latour.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In a decade of amazing vintages, 1987 and 1984 were the only weak vintages, but, at least they provided opportunities for people like me to try first growths.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You may be interested to know that Robert Parker gave the 1984 a score of just 80. I thought that that might be the worst ever rating for Mouton so I looked the 1964, and saw the following comment:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;The 1964 Mouton is a notable failure because it was picked late in the deluge of rain that wiped out those chateaux that were waiting for extra ripeness. One wonders why Bordeaux&#039;s best chateaux do not declassify the entire crop when they produce a wine such as this. A sweet, cooked bouquet is followed by equally sweet, disjointed, flabby flavors. Last tasted, 1/91.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He gave it a score of 55!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Doesn&#039;t it just show that is is better to follow your own palate rather than rely on the scores of the experts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting comment. I have only had a first growth twice in my life. One was a 1987 Lafite; and the other was a 1984 Latour.</p>
<p>In a decade of amazing vintages, 1987 and 1984 were the only weak vintages, but, at least they provided opportunities for people like me to try first growths.</p>
<p>You may be interested to know that Robert Parker gave the 1984 a score of just 80. I thought that that might be the worst ever rating for Mouton so I looked the 1964, and saw the following comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;The 1964 Mouton is a notable failure because it was picked late in the deluge of rain that wiped out those chateaux that were waiting for extra ripeness. One wonders why Bordeaux&#8217;s best chateaux do not declassify the entire crop when they produce a wine such as this. A sweet, cooked bouquet is followed by equally sweet, disjointed, flabby flavors. Last tasted, 1/91.&#8221;</p>
<p>He gave it a score of 55!</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t it just show that is is better to follow your own palate rather than rely on the scores of the experts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal</title>
		<link>http://louisandlouisa.com/2006/06/its-only-a-drink/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisandlouisa.com/?p=154#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I have only recently discovered the Bordeaux wines - doing a Bordeaux wine course last year. We tried the Ch Batailley as well - fantastic.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have had the very good fortune to have tried a 1964 and a 1984 Ch Mouton Rothschild (alongside a 1964 and a 1984 Grange Hermitage - at a friend&#039;s 40th birthday) - the 1964 Mouton is simply the best wine I have ever had and maybe ever will have. However, it will be fun trying to top it. If I don&#039;t - oh well - it is just a drink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only recently discovered the Bordeaux wines &#8211; doing a Bordeaux wine course last year. We tried the Ch Batailley as well &#8211; fantastic.</p>
<p>I have had the very good fortune to have tried a 1964 and a 1984 Ch Mouton Rothschild (alongside a 1964 and a 1984 Grange Hermitage &#8211; at a friend&#8217;s 40th birthday) &#8211; the 1964 Mouton is simply the best wine I have ever had and maybe ever will have. However, it will be fun trying to top it. If I don&#8217;t &#8211; oh well &#8211; it is just a drink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

